hidden pixel

Economics of the Public Sector Information

Public economics (or economics of the public sector) is the study of government policy through the lens of economics efficiency and equity. At its most basic level, public economics provides a framework for thinking about whether or not the government should participate in economics markets and to what extent its role should be. In order to do so, microeconomic theory is utilized to assess whether the private market is likely to provide efficient outcomes in the absence of governmental interference. Inherently, this study involves the analysis of government taxation and expenditures. This subject encompasses a host of topics including market failures, externalities, and the creation and implementation of government policy. Public economics builds on the theory of welfare economics and is ultimately used as a tool to improve social welfare.

Broad methods and topics include:

Emphasis is on analytical and scientific methods and normative-ethical analysis, as distinguished from ideology. Examples of topics covered are tax incidence, optimal taxation, and the theory of public goods.[3]

Contents

Markets and governments efficiency and failure

Main articles: Market failure and Government failure

Natural monopoly

Main article: Natural monopoly

Information asymmetry

Main article: Information asymmetry

Public good

Main article: Public good

A public good has the feature that the marginal cost of an additional individual enjoying it is zero. Examples include an army, street lighting, radio signals or information. If there is an army defending one person in a country, a street lamp for one person, a radio signal for one person, then it is with no extra cost that two or more people use the service. For information, whose character as a public good was emphasised by Joseph Stiglitz, an old aphorism of philosopher Bertrand Russell holds true,

"If I have one apple and you have one apple and we exchange apples, we both have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange ideas, then we both have two."

The problem of the public good is that if people can use the good or service at the same time and cannot be excluded from its use (which with a cost they sometimes can, e.g. encoding a Wifi signal with a password) then people can "free-ride" on its use. Consumers will not be contributing to the costs of production. Because producers cannot recoup enough expenses, there will be an underproduction of public goods. There is therefore a role for state intervention. The government through taxation can get all people to contribute.[5]

Externality

Main article: Externality

Incomplete markets

Main article: Incomplete markets

Macroeconomic instability

Main articles: Unemployment, inflation, and disequilibrium

Public expenditure

Public goods

Main article: Public goods

Public goods are [non-excludable] and [non-rivaled]. Something is non-excludable if its use is cannot be limited to a certain group of people. For example, since one cannot prevent people from viewing a firework display it is non-excludable. Something is non-rivaled if one person's consumption of it does not deprive another person, again (to a point) a firework display is non-rivaled - since one person watching a firework display does not prevent another person from doing so.

Public choice and the political process

Main article: Public choice

Externalities and government policy

Main article: Externalities

Particular sectors

Main article: Public services

Health care

Main article: Health care

Defence and technology

Main article: Defence industry

Social insurance

Main article: Social security

Welfare programs and the redistribution of income

Main articles: Unemployment benefits and Labour economics

Education

Main article: Education

Regulated markets

Main article: Regulatory economics

Emergency and local services

Public finance and taxation

Main articles: Public finance and Taxation

Further Reading

See also

Notes

  1. ^ • B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel, 2008. "behavioural public economics," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition Abstract. • Dani Rodrik, 1996. "Understanding Economic Policy Reform," Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), pp. 9–41 (press +).
  2. ^ • Mrinal Datta-Chaudhuri, 1990. "Market Failure and Government Failure." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3) , pp. 25-39 (press +). • Kenneth J. Arrow, 1969. "The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-market Allocations," in Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPP System. Washington, D.C., Joint Economic Committee of Congress. PDF reprint as pp. 1-16 (press +). • Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2009. "Regulation and Failure," in David Moss and John Cisternino (eds.), New Perspectives on Regulation, ch. 1, pp. 11-23. Cambridge: The Tobin Project.
  3. ^ • Serge-Christophe Kolm, 1987. "public economics," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 3, pp. 1047-48. • Anthony B. Atkinson and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1980. Lectures in Public Economics, McGraw-Hill, pp. vii-xi.
  4. ^ Joseph Stiglitz, 'John Kenneth Galbraith understood capitalism as lived - not as theorized' (28.12.2008) Christian Science Monitor
  5. ^Mancur Olson, 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, 2nd ed. Description and chapter-preview links, pp. ix-x.James M. Buchanan, 1968. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Rand McNally. Chapter links.

References

1985, v. 1. Description and preview.
1987, v. 2. Description.
2002. v. 3. Description.
2007. v. 4. Description.

External links

Categories: Socioeconomics | Public economics

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers]
This page was last archived by our server on Mon Jul 18 19:43:54 2011.
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.